All Posts

Intended audience: Advanced reactor founders and engineering leads building their first Quality Assurance Program Description, and the investors evaluating whether that program is real. Executive Summary The Quality Assurance Program Description, the QAPD, is the only part of a developer's quality program that becomes public record, the part that lands on ADAMS. It's what gets docketed and reviewed, with the NRC issuing a Safety Evaluation Report in response once that review

Intended audience: Advanced reactor developers, investors, and members of the public trying to understand NRC's proposed radiation protection rulemaking under Executive Order 14300, including the science behind the cancer-proximity claims raised in public comment. Executive Summary On August 10, 2026, I attended an NRC public meeting on proposed rule W1-2, "Reforming and Modernizing the NRC's Radiation Protection Framework," part of the agency's broader rulemaking effort und

Intended audience: Investors and family offices evaluating advanced reactor companies pursuing DOE authorization, and the founders raising capital on the strength of DOE milestones. Executive Summary A DOE authorization lets a developer build and operate a demonstration reactor. It does not let that developer sell electricity commercially, and any revenue generated during a DOE demonstration is incidental to the demonstration's purpose, not a business model. I've seen investo

Small Pressurized Water Reactor. Image is AI generated. Executive Summary 10 CFR 50.33/50.34 is the current two-step Part 50 application architecture: general information plus a preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) at the construction-permit (CP) stage, then a final safety analysis report (FSAR) plus operating, emergency planning (EP), security, and other operating-license (OL) content later. Proposed rule 10 CFR 57.55/57.60 is very different: it is a proposed-only, elig

Intended audience: Investors and advanced reactor developers trying to understand what a construction permit does and doesn't authorize, using TerraPower's Natrium project as the reference case. Executive Summary On July 21, 2026, TerraPower became the first advanced reactor company ever accepted into the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), a voluntary industry body dedicated to operational excellence at commercial nuclear plants. It's a real signal that TerraPower

Regulatory Pathways. Image is AI generated, of course. Executive summary For a small light water reactor (LWR) sold in multi-unit packs, the practical licensing choice today is still among Part 50, Part 52, and now Part 53. Proposed Part 57 is not yet effective, and it is not simply a “non-power reactor” rule. It is a new proposed commercial framework for microreactors and other reactors with comparable risk profiles, derived from the NRC’s non-power/utilization-facility appr

Intended audience: Investors and family offices evaluating advanced reactor deals, and the founders preparing to be evaluated. Executive Summary Advanced reactor pitches are compelling, and the most compelling ones aren't always the most credible. Technical founders can be genuinely brilliant and still be years away from a defensible licensing basis — fluency and maturity are not the same thing. This post lays out five questions, deliberately built to require no technical bac

Screenshot of the draft guidance cover page Intended audience: For advanced reactor developers transitioning from DOE or Department of War authorization toward an NRC commercial license application, and the investors evaluating whether that transition is being handled correctly. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2536/ML25363A192.pdf Executive summary The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) April 2026 draft interim staff guidance (ISG) on reactor designs previously authorized by U.

Intended for ratepayers, policymakers, and energy market participants trying to understand who actually pays for the infrastructure a new data center requires — and why that answer has been changing state by state since 2025. Executive Summary Rising electricity bills are increasingly tied to data center load growth, but not because data centers bill residential customers directly. The mechanism runs through the utility rate case: when a utility needs new generation, transmis

Intended for advanced reactor developers, investors, workforce development, and licensing professionals evaluating where the nuclear licensing market is heading — and which capabilities will hold value as it gets there. Executive Summary The advanced reactor field looks crowded from the outside — 119 companies and 172 unique reactor designs, per the Gibboney Nuclear July 2026 dataset. But demand for licensing capability and the supply of people who can deliver it are moving i

Black swans by the power plant. AI created image. In hindsight, 2022 may be the most consequential year for nuclear energy in decades. Three events — geopolitical, technological, and scientific — collided within ten months and quietly reset the trajectory of global power demand and energy strategy. Almost no forecast model captured all three. 1️⃣ February 2022: Energy Became National Security Russia’s invasion of Ukraine shattered long-standing assumptions about global energy

Image AI generated In the summer of 2025 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began work on 10 CFR Part 57, a rule that would create a dedicated licensing pathway for factory‑fabricated microreactors and other low‑consequence reactors. The regulation hasn’t yet appeared in the Federal Register (as of Jan 30 2026), but several public sources describe what is coming and why it matters. Why now? Executive Order 14300 (May 23 2025) requires the NRC to “establish a process

Intended audience: Advanced reactor developers, founders, engineering teams, and investors evaluating nuclear construction programs — particularly readers of "The $35 Billion Lesson: What Vogtle Actually Teaches Advanced Reactor Developers." Executive Summary In February 2016, Bechtel Corporation delivered a project assessment of the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion to its owners, SCANA/SCE&G and Santee Cooper. The report identified eight significant issues, the first of which w

Intended audience: Advanced reactor developers, founders, engineering teams, and investors evaluating nuclear construction programs. Executive Summary Vogtle Units 3 and 4 originally carried a $14 billion budget and a completion target of 2016 and 2017. They entered commercial operation in July 2023 and April 2024 at a total cost exceeding $35 billion — more than $21 billion over budget and seven years late. The project is frequently cited as evidence that nuclear constructio

Intended audience: Data center operators, hyperscaler infrastructure teams, and energy procurement decision-makers evaluating nuclear power as a long-term baseload solution. Executive Summary Every conversation about nuclear power for data centers starts with the same assumption: 8–12 years to commercial operation. That assumption is correct for developers starting the licensing process today. It is not correct for all designs currently on the market. On May 29, 2025, the NRC

May 26, 2026 Executive Summary Proposed 10 CFR Part 57 is the first NRC commercial licensing framework to explicitly authorize remote operation and autonomous operation of nuclear power plants. The NRC calls this "a paradigm shift for the nuclear industry and the NRC" — and means it. The proposed rule contains definitions, application content requirements, staffing classifications, and operator licensing provisions that collectively sketch the outline of a new regulatory mode

May 21, 2026 Executive Summary Proposed 10 CFR Part 57 establishes two eligibility criteria for entry into its streamlined licensing framework. The first — a 1 rem TEDE dose limit at the unrestricted area boundary — is a well-constructed Figure of Merit that the NRC itself describes as such in the proposed rule's preamble, and it already does the work the second criterion is trying to do, and does it better. The second — a 10 metric ton limit on special nuclear material (SNM)

April 8, 2026 - Gibboney Nuclear, PLLC is pleased to announce a new engagement with Applied Atomics to develop a nuclear-grade Quality Assurance Program (QAP) in support of their reactor development efforts. As advanced reactor companies move from concept to commercialization, the ability to demonstrate design control, traceability, and regulatory alignment becomes critical. A well-structured QAP ensures that engineering work is not only performed, but captured in a way that

An advanced reactor startup with significant capital and an aggressive deployment timeline engaged Gibboney Nuclear to establish regulatory credibility. This case study shows why expert advice only creates value when leadership is willing to act on it and how early discipline matters more than speed when regulators and investors are watching.

January 8, 2026 - Introducing the Gibboney Nuclear Services Brochure Advanced reactor programs don’t fail because the engineering is weak — they struggle when licensing strategy, quality execution, and safety integration drift out of alignment. Our newly released Gibboney Nuclear Services Brochure explains how we help advanced reactor developers close that gap. Inside, you’ll find a clear overview of our integrated approach to licensing foundations, quality program infrastru